Curriculum-Based Strategies for Efficient Cross-Domain Action Recognition

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that curriculum-based training strategies can significantly improve the efficiency of cross-domain human action recognition models, especially when transferring from ground-view to aerial-view data, without using aerial data during training.

Contribution

It introduces two curriculum learning methods for cross-view action recognition that enhance training efficiency while maintaining high accuracy, using synthetic and real ground-view data.

Findings

Combining synthetic aerial and real ground data outperforms single-domain training.

Curriculum strategies reduce training iterations by up to 37% for CNN and 30% for Transformer models.

Performance remains within 3% accuracy of simple dataset combination.

Abstract

Despite significant progress in human action recognition, generalizing to diverse viewpoints remains a challenge. Most existing datasets are captured from ground-level perspectives, and models trained on them often struggle to transfer to drastically different domains such as aerial views. This paper examines how curriculum-based training strategies can improve generalization to unseen real aerial-view data without using any real aerial data during training. We explore curriculum learning for cross-view action recognition using two out-of-domain sources: synthetic aerial-view data and real ground-view data. Our results on the evaluation on order of training (fine-tuning on synthetic aerial data vs. real ground data) shows that fine-tuning on real ground data but differ in how they transition from synthetic to real. The first uses a two-stage curriculum with direct fine-tuning, while the second applies a progressive curriculum that expands the dataset in multiple stages before fine-tuning. We evaluate both methods on the REMAG dataset using SlowFast (CNN-based) and MViTv2 (Transformer-based) architectures. Results show that combining the two out-of-domain datasets clearly outperforms training on a single domain, whether real ground-view or synthetic aerial-view. Both curriculum strategies match the top-1 accuracy of simple dataset combination while offering efficiency gains. With the two-step fine-tuning method, SlowFast achieves up to a 37% reduction in iterations and MViTv2 up to a 30% reduction compared to simple combination. The multi-step progressive approach further reduces iterations, by up to 9% for SlowFast and 30% for MViTv2, relative to the two-step method. These findings demonstrate that curriculum-based training can maintain comparable performance (top-1 accuracy within 3% range) while improving training efficiency in cross-view action recognition.