Topological Criteria for Hypothesis Testing with Finite-Precision Measurements
Philip Boeken, Eduardo Skapinakis, Konstantin Genin, Joris M. Mooij

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when finite-precision statistical hypothesis testing is possible using topological conditions, revealing fundamental limitations and proposing conditions for consistent testing of independence.
Contribution
It establishes topological necessary and sufficient conditions for finite-precision hypothesis testing, including criteria for consistent and uniform error control.
Findings
Finite-precision tests are equivalent to classical tests in error control.
Hypotheses are testable if both are $F_σ$ in the weak topology.
Conditional independence is not testable without additional assumptions.
Abstract
We establish topological necessary and sufficient conditions under which a pair of statistical hypotheses can be consistently distinguished when i.i.d. observations are recorded only to finite precision. To accommodate finite-precision data, we introduce finite-precision tests: tests whose decision regions are open in the sample-space topology. We first show that, both for classical and finite-precision tests, the existence of such tests with finite-sample error control, asymptotic error control, or uniform convergence of the errors are all equivalent. A pair of null- and alternative hypotheses and admits a consistent finite-precision test if and only if both are in the weak topology on the space of probability measures . The hypotheses admit uniform error control under if and only if is closed in , and admit uniformly consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
