Follow-up of three exocomet-host candidates

TL;DR

This study investigates three stars with variable spectral features to determine if they host exocomets, finding strong variability in one star but inconclusive results for the others, highlighting the need for further monitoring.

Contribution

The paper provides detailed spectroscopic analysis of three exocomet candidate stars, emphasizing the importance of monitoring to confirm exocomet activity and addressing potential mimicking mechanisms.

Findings

HD 85905 shows variability consistent with exocomet activity.

Binarity complicates interpretation of variability signatures.

Further long-term monitoring is required for definitive conclusions.

Abstract

Exocomets are small bodies that evaporate when they approach their host star. They are detected through variability of non-photospheric features with spectroscopy and/or asymmetric transits in time-series photometry. In the past four decades ~30 systems have shown such variations, and were therefore classified as exocomet host stars. However, some publications have pointed out mechanisms that might mimic exocometary features, and therefore, careful monitoring is needed to confirm the origin of the observed variability. With this paper we aim to investigate the exocomet nature of the non-photospheric variable features observed in the exocomet candidate stars HD 36546, HD 42111 and HD 85905. All of them have shown some degree of variability, particularly in their Ca II K line. We analysed the non-photospheric Ca II K line features from high-resolution spectra obtained using new NOT/FIES and Mercator/HERMES, and some additional archival spectra of the target stars. The variability was quantified through the changes in the equivalent widths of those features, which are assumed to be of circumstellar origin. Column densities were also estimated for each variable feature. Strong variability was found for HD 85905, consistent with a potential link to exocometary activity. However, the binarity of the system, which we confirmed through interferometric VLTI/PIONIER observations, complicates the interpretation of these signatures and prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions. The remaining two sources do not show any significant variability, but due to the sporadic nature of the exocometary events, we cannot discard the exocomet hypothesis. Further monitoring of the stars will be necessary to carry out a robust determination of the variability patterns and timescales that would completely rule out other scenarios.