The Geometry of Thought: How Scale Restructures Reasoning In Large Language Models
Samuel Cyrenius Anderson

TL;DR
This paper explores how scaling large language models affects reasoning, revealing domain-specific geometric phase transitions and introducing neural reasoning operators to predict reasoning outcomes.
Contribution
It uncovers domain-specific geometric restructuring in reasoning with scale and proposes neural reasoning operators for predicting reasoning endpoints.
Findings
Legal reasoning shows dimensionality collapse and untangling with scale.
Scientific and mathematical reasoning remain geometrically invariant despite scale increases.
Neural reasoning operators achieve 63.6% accuracy in predicting reasoning endpoints.
Abstract
Scale does not uniformly improve reasoning - it restructures it. Analyzing 25,000+ chain-of-thought trajectories across four domains (Law, Science, Code, Math) and two scales (8B, 70B parameters), we discover that neural scaling laws trigger domain-specific phase transitions rather than uniform capability gains. Legal reasoning undergoes Crystallization: 45% collapse in representational dimensionality (d95: 501 -> 274), 31% increase in trajectory alignment, and 10x manifold untangling. Scientific and mathematical reasoning remain Liquid - geometrically invariant despite 9x parameter increase. Code reasoning forms a discrete Lattice of strategic modes (silhouette: 0.13 -> 0.42). This geometry predicts learnability. We introduce Neural Reasoning Operators - learned mappings from initial to terminal hidden states. In crystalline legal reasoning, our operator achieves 63.6% accuracy on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
