RegCheck: A tool for automating comparisons between study registrations and papers
Jamie Cummins, Beth Clarke, Ian Hussey, Malte Elson

TL;DR
RegCheck is an AI-assisted tool that automates the comparison of study registrations and research papers, enhancing transparency and reproducibility while keeping human judgment central.
Contribution
It introduces a modular, domain-adaptable system that facilitates comparison tasks with human oversight and shareable reports, addressing labor-intensive manual review processes.
Findings
Automates comparison between registrations and papers
Supports human-in-the-loop decision making
Generates shareable, verifiable reports
Abstract
Across the social and medical sciences, researchers recognize that specifying planned research activities (i.e., 'registration') prior to the commencement of research has benefits for both the transparency and rigour of science. Despite this, evidence suggests that study registrations frequently go unexamined, minimizing their effectiveness. In a way this is no surprise: manually checking registrations against papers is labour- and time-intensive, requiring careful reading across formats and expertise across domains. The advent of AI unlocks new possibilities in facilitating this activity. We present RegCheck, a modular LLM-assisted tool designed to help researchers, reviewers, and editors from across scientific disciplines compare study registrations with their corresponding papers. Importantly, RegCheck keeps human expertise and judgement in the loop by (i) ensuring that users are the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
