Not so-dark: High resolution HI imaging of J0139+4328 and identification of an optical counterpart
Barbara \v{S}iljeg, Elizabeth A. K. Adams, Tom A. Oosterloo, Filippo Fraternali, Kelley M. Hess, Jin-Long Xu, and Ming Zhu

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution VLA imaging to identify an optical counterpart of a candidate dark galaxy, revealing it as a gas-rich, low-mass galaxy consistent with known relations, emphasizing the importance of high-resolution data.
Contribution
First high-resolution interferometric follow-up of a dark galaxy candidate, demonstrating the necessity of detailed imaging for accurate identification and characterization.
Findings
Identified an optical counterpart to the HI source J0139+4328.
Found the galaxy has a stellar mass of 3 x 10^6 M_Sun and high gas richness.
Confirmed the galaxy's properties align with known stellar-to-HI mass and baryonic Tully-Fisher relations.
Abstract
Dark galaxies - systems rich in neutral hydrogen (HI) gas but with no stars - are a common prediction of numerous theoretical models and cosmological simulations. However, the unequivocal identification of such sources in current HI surveys has proven challenging. In this work, we present interferometric follow-up observations with the VLA of a former dark galaxy candidate J0139+4328, originally detected with the single-dish FAST telescope. The improved spatial resolution of the VLA data allow us to identify a faint optical counterpart and characterize the galaxy. Located at a distance of about 31 Mpc, J0139+4328 has a stellar mass of 3 x 10^6 M_Sun and a relatively high gas richness of M_HI/M_star = 18. Despite its high ratio, the galaxy is consistent, within the scatter, with the stellar-to-HI mass relation of HI-selected samples in the literature and with the baryonic Tully-Fisher…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
