Small-Error Cascaded Group Testing
Daniel McMorrow, Nikhil Karamchandani, Sidharth Jaggi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the cascaded group testing model, establishing bounds for various recovery criteria with adaptive and non-adaptive tests, and demonstrates near-optimality under size constraints.
Contribution
It introduces the cascaded group testing model, derives achievability bounds for different recovery criteria, and proves near-optimality in constrained test size scenarios.
Findings
Established achievability bounds for multiple recovery criteria.
Demonstrated bounds are nearly optimal under size constraints.
Analyzed both adaptive and non-adaptive test designs.
Abstract
Group testing concerns itself with the accurate recovery of a set of "defective" items from a larger population via a series of tests. While most works in this area have considered the classical group testing model, where tests are binary and indicate the presence of at least one defective item in the test, we study the cascaded group testing model. In cascaded group testing, tests admit an ordering, and test outcomes indicate the first defective item in the test under this ordering. Under this model, we establish various achievability bounds for several different recovery criteria using both non-adaptive and adaptive test designs when assuming both unconstrained and constrained test sizes. In the constrained test size setting, we also provide a lower bound showing our achievability result is optimal up to logarithmic factors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
