A Mind Cannot Be Smeared Across Time
Michael Timothy Bennett

TL;DR
This paper explores how the timing of computation affects machine consciousness, showing that sequential systems cannot achieve true conscious unity without simultaneous processing, emphasizing the importance of hardware in consciousness.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework combining Stack Theory and temporal semantics to analyze the necessity of simultaneous processing for consciousness.
Findings
Sequential systems cannot realize conscious conjunctions under the Chord postulate.
Conscious unity depends on objective co-instantiation within a time window.
Neurophysiological evidence links consciousness to phase synchrony and connectivity.
Abstract
Whether machines can be conscious depends not only on what they compute, but \emph{when} they compute it. Most deployed artificial systems realise their functions via sequential or time-multiplexed updates, yet a moment of conscious experience feels unified and simultaneous. I prove that this difference matters. I augment Stack Theory with algebraic laws relating within time-window constraint satisfaction to conjunction. I introduce a temporal semantics over windowed trajectories and prove that existential temporal realisation does not preserve conjunction. A system can realise all the ingredients of experience across time without ever instantiating the experienced conjunction itself. I then distinguish two postulates, Chord and Arpeggio. Chord is the position that conscious unity requires \textit{objective co-instantiation} of the grounded…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Security and Verification in Computing · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
