A Concise Agent is Less Expert: Revealing Side Effects of Using Style Features on Conversational Agents
Young-Min Cho, Yuan Yuan, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Lyle Ungar

TL;DR
This paper systematically studies how prompting for specific style features in conversational agents causes unintended side effects, revealing deep entanglements among styles and challenging current control methods.
Contribution
It introduces the first comprehensive analysis of stylistic side effects in LLMs, including a new dataset and evaluation of mitigation strategies.
Findings
Prompting for one style reduces perceived expertise.
Style features are deeply entangled, not independent.
Mitigation strategies often degrade primary styles.
Abstract
Style features such as friendly, helpful, or concise are widely used in prompts to steer the behavior of Large Language Model (LLM) conversational agents, yet their unintended side effects remain poorly understood. In this work, we present the first systematic study of cross-feature stylistic side effects. We conduct a comprehensive survey of 127 conversational agent papers from ACL Anthology and identify 12 frequently used style features. Using controlled, synthetic dialogues across task-oriented and open domain settings, we quantify how prompting for one style feature causally affects others via a pairwise LLM as a Judge evaluation framework. Our results reveal consistent and structured side effects, such as prompting for conciseness significantly reduces perceived expertise. They demonstrate that style features are deeply entangled rather than orthogonal. To support future research,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Topic Modeling · AI in Service Interactions
