Sensor Placement for Urban Traffic Interpolation: A Data-Driven Evaluation to Inform Policy

TL;DR

This paper evaluates data-driven strategies for urban traffic sensor placement using real-world data, demonstrating significant error reductions and policy implications for efficient traffic monitoring.

Contribution

It provides a large-scale benchmarking of spatial and temporal sensor deployment strategies, highlighting effective methods for improving traffic volume estimation.

Findings

Spatial coverage and active learning strategies reduce prediction errors by over 60-70%.

Even distribution of temporary sensors across weekdays improves accuracy.

Data-driven placement strategies outperform administrative or random approaches.

Abstract

Data on citywide street-segment traffic volumes are essential for urban planning and sustainable mobility management. Yet such data are available only for a limited subset of streets due to the high costs of sensor deployment and maintenance. Traffic volumes on the remaining network are therefore interpolated based on existing sensor measurements. However, current sensor locations are often determined by administrative priorities rather than by data-driven optimization, leading to biased coverage and reduced estimation performance. This study provides a large-scale, real-world benchmarking of easily implementable, data-driven strategies for optimizing the placement of permanent and temporary traffic sensors, using segment-level data from Berlin (Strava bicycle counts) and Manhattan (taxi counts). It compares spatial placement strategies based on network centrality, spatial coverage, feature coverage, and active learning. In addition, the study examines temporal deployment schemes for temporary sensors. The findings highlight that spatial placement strategies that emphasize even spatial coverage and employ active learning achieve the lowest prediction errors. With only 10 sensors, they reduce the mean absolute error by over 60% in Berlin and 70% in Manhattan compared to alternatives. Temporal deployment choices further improve performance: distributing measurements evenly across weekdays reduces error by an additional 7% in Berlin and 21% in Manhattan. Together, these spatial and temporal principles allow temporary deployments to closely approximate the performance of optimally placed permanent deployments. From a policy perspective, the results indicate that cities can substantially improve data usefulness by adopting data-driven sensor placement strategies, while retaining flexibility in choosing between temporary and permanent deployments.