Ramsey number of a cycle versus a graph of a given size
Stijn Cambie, Andrea Freschi, Patryk Morawski, Kalina Petrova, Alexey Pokrovskiy

TL;DR
This paper establishes an upper bound on the Ramsey number for a cycle versus a graph with given edges, solving a longstanding problem in combinatorics.
Contribution
It proves a new upper bound on the Ramsey number for cycles versus graphs with many edges, resolving a problem posed by Erdős et al.
Findings
The Ramsey number R(C_k,H) is at most 2m + floor((k-1)/2) for large m.
The result applies to graphs with no isolated vertices.
It confirms a conjecture for sufficiently large graphs.
Abstract
In this paper, we prove that for every and every graph with edges and no isolated vertices, the Ramsey number is at most , provided is sufficiently large with respect to . This settles a problem of Erd\H{o}s, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
