Inconsistency of Reinhardt cardinals with $\mathsf{ZF}$
Rupert McCallum

TL;DR
This paper proves that the existence of a certain type of non-trivial elementary embedding in set theory is inconsistent with ZF, clarifying the limitations of large cardinal hypotheses.
Contribution
It establishes the inconsistency of specific Reinhardt cardinals with ZF and introduces new large cardinal properties with intermediate consistency strength.
Findings
Non-trivial $oldsymbol{ ext{Sigma}_1}$-elementary embeddings are inconsistent with ZF.
Introduces new large cardinal properties between $oldsymbol{ ext{I}_3}$ and $oldsymbol{ ext{I}_2}$.
Proves the main inconsistency result within ZF framework.
Abstract
A proof will be presented that the existence of a non-trivial -elementary embedding is inconsistent with . Sections 1 and 2 shall review various important contributions from the literature, notably including \cite{Goldberg2020}, \cite{Schlutzenberg2020}, and \cite{Woodin2010}, the latter reference being where the crucial forcing construction is presented. Section 3 shall introduce some new large cardinal properties, of consistency strength intermediate between and , and greater than , respectively. The proof of the inconsistency with of the existence of a non-trivial -elementary embedding shall be given in Section 4. The claims of Sections 2 and 4 are provable in ; those of Section 3, with the exception of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
