TL;DR
This paper evaluates how well large language models handle false assumptions in real-world health questions, revealing significant safety gaps in their ability to redirect misconceptions, which is crucial for safe medical AI deployment.
Contribution
The study introduces MedRedFlag, a new dataset of over 1100 health questions with false premises, and systematically compares LLM responses to clinicians, highlighting critical safety issues.
Findings
LLMs often fail to redirect problematic health questions.
LLMs provide answers that may lead to suboptimal medical decisions.
The benchmark exposes a significant gap in LLM safety for health communication.
Abstract
Real-world health questions from patients often unintentionally embed false assumptions or premises. In such cases, safe medical communication typically involves redirection: addressing the implicit misconception and then responding to the underlying patient context, rather than the original question. While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used by lay users for medical advice, they have not yet been tested for this crucial competency. Therefore, in this work, we investigate how LLMs react to false premises embedded within real-world health questions. We develop a semi-automated pipeline to curate MedRedFlag, a dataset of 1100+ questions sourced from Reddit that require redirection. We then systematically compare responses from state-of-the-art LLMs to those from clinicians. Our analysis reveals that LLMs often fail to redirect problematic questions, even when the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
