Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases
Stefan Kulk, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius

TL;DR
The paper analyzes recent EU court rulings on copyright enforcement filters, arguing that these decisions do not significantly advance privacy and freedom of information rights.
Contribution
It provides a legal analysis of the Court of Justice's rulings and discusses their implications for fundamental rights in the context of copyright enforcement.
Findings
EU court rulings prohibit mandatory filters for copyright enforcement
Little progress has been made for privacy rights
The rulings have limited impact on freedom of information
Abstract
Sabam, a Belgian collective rights management organisation, wanted an internet access provider and a social network site to install a filter system to enforce copyrights. In two recent judgments, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that the social network site and the internet access provider cannot be required to install the filter system that Sabam asked for. Are these judgments good news for fundamental rights? This article argues that little is won for privacy and freedom of information.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFreedom of Expression and Defamation · Copyright and Intellectual Property · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
