A Theoretical Framework for Rate-Distortion Limits in Learned Image Compression
Changshuo Wang, Zijian Liang, Kai Niu, Ping Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding the rate-distortion limits of learned image compression, decomposing performance loss into key components and providing insights for system design.
Contribution
It offers a novel, interpretable analysis method for learned image codecs, bridging empirical results with information-theoretic limits and guiding future improvements.
Findings
Derived optimal latent variance under Gaussian assumption
Quantified gap between uniform quantization and Gaussian test channel
Demonstrated impact of accurate mean prediction on entropy reduction
Abstract
We present a novel systematic theoretical framework to analyze the rate-distortion (R-D) limits of learned image compression. While recent neural codecs have achieved remarkable empirical results, their distance from the information-theoretic limit remains unclear. Our work addresses this gap by decomposing the R-D performance loss into three key components: variance estimation, quantization strategy, and context modeling. First, we derive the optimal latent variance as the second moment under a Gaussian assumption, providing a principled alternative to hyperprior-based estimation. Second, we quantify the gap between uniform quantization and the Gaussian test channel derived from the reverse water-filling theorem. Third, we extend our framework to include context modeling, and demonstrate that accurate mean prediction yields substantial entropy reduction. Unlike prior R-D estimators,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
- It is highly commendable that the authors seek to establish a rigorous theoretical framework for quantifying the performance gap between state-of-the-art codecs and information-theoretic limits. - The presentation is clear, well-structured, and easy to follow.
While the paper presents an ambitious and potentially valuable contribution, I have serious concerns about two core aspects of the theoretical framework and its implementation. If unaddressed, these issues would undermine the validity of the analysis, experiments, and conclusions. - *Scope of the distortion measure in the theoretical analysis.* The framework analyzes optimality in the latent space, with distortion measured between the continuous latent representation and its quantized version.
- This paper is theoretically grounded with an information-theoretic perspective. - Analyzing the R-D limits of existing learned image compression models is interesting. - The authors motivate general entropy coding frameworks, exhibiting potential impacts.
- The authors appear to simply believe that applying the reverse water-filling for distortion allocation in the quantization process from y to y_hat would lead to the optimal rate. However, for practical transform coding models like hyperprior, distortion is actually calculated in the pixel domain between $x$ and $\hat{x}$ after going through both analysis and synthesis transforms. In this case, the vanilla reverse water-filling does not necessarily hold. This paper has completely overlooked thi
This paper presents a systematic theoretical framework for analyzing the gap between learning image compression models and the information-theoretic rate-distortion limit. Based on Hyperprior structure, the framework decompose the performance gap from three aspects: variance modeling, quantization method and context modeling, and correspond to them through mathematical derivation and experimental verification. The paper is relatively complete in method design and shows the contribution of each m
1. Although the PSNR and MS-SSIM results reported in the papers are consistent with theoretical trends, the quantification of statistical fluctuations is lacking. Reproducibility and stability are crucial for research with "theoretical limits" as the core topic. 2. In the experiments, the latent variable dimensions M=192 and M=320 are used to correspond to different code rates, which is reasonable in engineering. However, the effect of model capacity on the theoretical rate-distortion gap has no
1. It tries to provide interpretable analysis for learned image compression, and discussses the rate-distortion limits. 2. Motivation is clear and the manuscript is well organized. 3. The analysis of scaling coefficient of $y$ is interesting.
1. Context model not only predicts the mean value of $y$, but also the variance of $y$. This is not accurate for the whole section 3.5, especially for the equation 11. 2. It is just similar with the prior work "Rethinking Learned Image Compression: Context is All You Need"(https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11590), which also analyzes the quantization and context model. 3. The importance of $y$ is also dependent on the content of region of image itself, thus the scaling coefficient of $y$ may also no
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Data Compression Techniques · Image and Video Quality Assessment · Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
