Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation,A Simpler Proof
Luisiana X. Cundin

TL;DR
This paper simplifies the analysis of the Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, confirming that its best solution is null through more straightforward methods and alternative representations.
Contribution
It provides a simpler proof that the solution to the equation is null, using recent insights into convolution integrals and inverse Fourier transforms.
Findings
The solution is confirmed to be null.
Simplified proof avoids complex nested integrals.
Alternative solution representations also yield null solutions.
Abstract
Previous analysis of the Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation proved the best solution is null; although, the method of solution generated complex nested integrals, therefore, difficult to analyze \cite{NWSgen,NWS2020}. Recent insights into the properties of the convolution integral enable considerable simplification of the solution in the codomain, producing much simpler representations. The inverse Fourier transform of the spectral solution proves to be a non-bijective, null solution, therefore, confirming previous suspicions. Alternative representations of the solution, either expansions or Fujita type solutions, all prove the solution to be a null function.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Biology Tumor Growth · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
