LERA: Reinstating Judgment as a Structural Precondition for Execution in Automated Systems
Jing (Linda) Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces LERA, a structural framework that enforces judgment as a mandatory prerequisite for execution in automated systems, aiming to improve accountability and legitimacy.
Contribution
LERA formalizes judgment as a structural, non-bypassable component in AI architectures, addressing a missing role in current decision-to-execution pipelines.
Findings
LERA enforces judgment as a structural gate for execution.
It decouples execution legitimacy from computational capacity.
Provides a governance framework for accountable automation.
Abstract
As automated systems increasingly transition from decision support to direct execution, the problem of accountability shifts from decision quality to execution legitimacy. While optimization, execution, and feedback mechanisms are extensively modeled in contemporary AI and control architectures, the structural role of judgment remains undefined. Judgment is typically introduced as an external intervention rather than a native precondition to execution. This work does not propose a new decision-making algorithm or safety heuristic, but identifies a missing structural role in contemporary AI and control architectures. This paper identifies this absence as a missing Judgment Root Node and proposes LERA (Judgment-Governance Architecture) , a structural framework that enforces judgment as a mandatory, non-bypassable prerequisite for execution. LERA is founded on two axioms: (1) execution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
