GraphSearch: Agentic Search-Augmented Reasoning for Zero-Shot Graph Learning
Jiajin Liu, Yuanfu Sun, Dongzhe Fan, Qiaoyu Tan

TL;DR
GraphSearch introduces a novel framework for zero-shot graph learning that leverages search-augmented reasoning with graph-aware querying and retrieval, enabling effective reasoning on graph-structured data without task-specific training.
Contribution
It is the first framework to extend search-augmented reasoning to graph learning, combining a graph-aware query planner and retriever for zero-shot tasks.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot node classification.
Outperforms supervised methods in link prediction.
Demonstrates flexibility across diverse graph benchmarks.
Abstract
Recent advances in search-augmented large reasoning models (LRMs) enable the retrieval of external knowledge to reduce hallucinations in multistep reasoning. However, their ability to operate on graph-structured data, prevalent in domains such as e-commerce, social networks, and scientific citations, remains underexplored. Unlike plain text corpora, graphs encode rich topological signals that connect related entities and can serve as valuable priors for retrieval, enabling more targeted search and improved reasoning efficiency. Yet, effectively leveraging such structure poses unique challenges, including the difficulty of generating graph-expressive queries and ensuring reliable retrieval that balances structural and semantic relevance. To address this gap, we introduce GraphSearch, the first framework that extends search-augmented reasoning to graph learning, enabling zero-shot graph…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. **The Combination of Large Reasoning Model and Graph-Aware Reasoning is Illuminating**: GraphSearch use LRM to guide graph search process by generating graph-search instructions, which can enable expressive search space control. And equip LRM with enabling zero-shot graph learning 2. **Detailed Analysis of Comprehensive Experiments**: This work provides a thorough empirical evaluation across six diverse benchmarks for both node classification and link prediction tasks across multiple graph do
1. **Low Computational Efficiency and Limited Performance Improvement**: All the target tasks to be addressed in this paper, which are node classification and link prediction tasks, are not complex enough to require the introduction of LRM for completion. Introducing LRM for reasoning will significantly increase the time cost of reasoning, while there is no significant improvement in performance compared with methods based on Graph Neural Networks such as GCN and GraphPrompter. 2. **Missing Rel
1.Bridging search-augmented reasoning with graphs is important for domains (e-commerce, social, citations) where topology carries critical priors that plain-text RAG overlooks. 2.Disentangling topological scope from semantic query is a clean design that can reduce retrieval noise and focus computation on structurally relevant regions. 3.Demonstrating competitive zero-shot graph learning results on node classification and link prediction, is noteworthy and of practical interest to agents that m
1.Much of the method reads as policy design (planner prompts, scope flags, hybrid scoring) rather than a fundamentally new retrieval or reasoning mechanism. The technical contribution should be highlighted. 2.The compared methods are limited given the claim of “first framework” and SOTA zero-shot results. Include: (i) planner–executor RAG on graphs/text, (ii) dense–sparse hybrid retrievers with structural priors, (iii) recent GraphRAG variants, and (iv) supervised GNNs tuned under equal budget.
1. It is the first framework that extends agentic search-augmented reasoning to graph-structured data, enabling zero-shot graph learning. 2. Its core contributions include a graph-aware query planner (which decouples search space from semantic queries), a graph-aware retriever (which constructs candidate sets based on topology and uses hybrid scoring), and two traversal modes: GraphSearch-R and GraphSearch-F. 3. Extending search-augmented LRM (Large Reasoning Model) to the graph domain is a mean
1. Essentially, it adapts existing search-augmented reasoning (e.g., Search-o1) to graph data, resulting in limited technical innovation. 2. It does not provide theoretical analysis on how graph structure affects reasoning. 3. It lacks a learning mechanism and fully relies on predefined prompt templates. 4. Figure 4 only demonstrates the impact of query structure awareness, with no ablation studies on other components. 5. It does not analyze the impact of different hop counts and candidate set s
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Graph Theory and Algorithms · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
