Contrastive and Multi-Task Learning on Noisy Brain Signals with Nonlinear Dynamical Signatures
Sucheta Ghosh, Felix Dietrich, Zahra Monfared

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel two-stage multitask learning framework for EEG analysis that combines denoising, dynamical modeling, and contrastive learning to improve robustness and accuracy in brain signal decoding.
Contribution
It introduces a staged approach that separates noise reduction from feature learning, integrating dynamical regime discrimination and contrastive learning for EEG signals.
Findings
Outperforms existing EEG decoding methods in robustness and accuracy
Enhances stability across different datasets
Effectively captures nonlinear brain dynamics
Abstract
We introduce a two-stage multitask learning framework for analyzing Electroencephalography (EEG) signals that integrates denoising, dynamical modeling, and representation learning. In the first stage, a denoising autoencoder is trained to suppress artifacts and stabilize temporal dynamics, providing robust signal representations. In the second stage, a multitask architecture processes these denoised signals to achieve three objectives: motor imagery classification, chaotic versus non-chaotic regime discrimination using Lyapunov exponent-based labels, and self-supervised contrastive representation learning with NT-Xent loss. A convolutional backbone combined with a Transformer encoder captures spatial-temporal structure, while the dynamical task encourages sensitivity to nonlinear brain dynamics. This staged design mitigates interference between reconstruction and discriminative goals,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
* Novel idea of using chaotic vs nonchaotic as a pretext task * ablation study to show effect of individual components * I found the writing to be fairly understandable
**Result inconsistencies** This work proposes a fairly complicated two-stage multi-task architecture for EEG decoding. To justify the complexity of the pipeline, the empirical evaluation must be very rigorously done and show where the pipeline improves over simpler decoding pipelines. Unfortunately, there seem to be multiple fundamental errors that question the results, especially the reported results of other methods in the manuscript: In Table 4, the "best-effort extractions from literature"
* The paper demonstrates originality by introducing a combination of denoising, multitask learning, and contrastive self-supervision within a unified EEG decoding framework. * The incorporation of Lyapunov exponent–based chaos detection is particularly novel, as it bridges nonlinear dynamical systems theory with modern deep learning, an intersection rarely explored in this domain. * The architectural design is well-motivated. * The paper is clearly written, with a logical flow that makes c
* The experimental validation is limited to two datasets (BCI2000 and BNCI Horizon 2020), both focused on motor imagery, which constrains the generalizability of the results. * Including additional datasets, such as BCI Competition IV-2a, PhysioNet EEG Motor Movement, or emotion and clinical EEG corpora, would better demonstrate cross-domain robustness. * The paper does not report computational metrics such as training time, parameter count, or inference latency, which are important for ass
- The paper is clearly organized and easy to follow.
- The contribution of this paper appears unclear to me. The multitask design is somewhat confusing, and further clarification is needed on the motivation for incorporating motor imagery (MI) classification into the original contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework. Moreover, the determination of whether signal dynamics are chaotic or non-chaotic through Lyapunov exponent estimation requires stronger theoretical justification and empirical evidence to demonstrate its effectiv
* Adoption dynamic theory in a multitask training setting for neural decoding which is shown effective. * Achieved state-of-the-art performance in motor imagery classification task using EEG.
* While the decoding results are promising, the ideas of multitask training and contrastive learning using NT-Xent are already well-proven and frequently deployed methodologies in the field for years. Adopting the LE-based loss is an interesting and novel idea, but the major source of performance gain is driven by denoising as shown in Table 3. * Moreover, integrating dynamic state theory is interesting but the main results and discussions are mostly focused on the decoding performance. This c
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural dynamics and brain function · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
