Beta-coalescents when sample size is large
Jonathan A Chetwynd-Diggle, Bjarki Eldon

TL;DR
This paper extends models of sweepstakes reproduction to include an upper bound on offspring number, analyzing how different bounds influence the convergence to Beta-coalescents and their impact on genetic diversity patterns.
Contribution
It introduces a biologically motivated upper bound on offspring number in coalescent models and analyzes its effects on convergence and genetic diversity.
Findings
Convergence to Beta-coalescents can be slow with certain bounds.
Small sample sizes may invalidate coalescent approximation.
Site-frequency spectrum aligns with the limiting tree predictions under Beta-coalescents.
Abstract
Sweepstakes reproduction refers to a highly skewed individual recruitment success without involving natural selection and may apply to individuals in broadcast spawning populations characterised by Type III survivorship. We consider an extension of the model of sweepstakes reproduction for a haploid panmictic population of constant size ; the extension also works as an alternative to the Wright-Fisher model. Our model incorporates an upper bound on the random number of potential offspring (juveniles) produced by a given individual. Depending on how the bound behaves relative to the total population size, we obtain the Kingman coalescent, an incomplete Beta-coalescent, or the (complete) Beta-coalescent. We argue that applying such an upper bound is biologically reasonable. Moreover, we estimate the error of the coalescent approximation. The error estimates reveal that convergence can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics · Animal Behavior and Reproduction · Genetic diversity and population structure
