Robustness of the 2-Choices Dynamics to Node Failures
Luke Meredith, Arpan Mukhopadhyay

TL;DR
This paper examines how the classical 2-choices distributed consensus algorithm maintains robustness against node failures, identifying thresholds where the majority opinion is preserved or lost, with implications for network reliability.
Contribution
It introduces a threshold-based analysis of the 2-choices dynamics under node failures, revealing phase transitions in opinion stability on different graph structures.
Findings
Majority opinion persists exponentially long when failure probability is below threshold.
Above the threshold, opinions quickly become evenly split, losing majority support.
The results apply to complete and expander graphs with spectral gap conditions.
Abstract
In many applications, it becomes necessary for a set of distributed network nodes to agree on a common value or opinion as quickly as possible and with minimal communication overhead. The classical 2-choices rule is a well-known distributed algorithm designed to achieve this goal. Under this rule, each node in a network updates its opinion at random instants by sampling two neighbours uniformly at random and then adopting the common opinion held by these neighbours if they agree. For a sufficiently well-connected network of nodes and two initial opinions, this simple rule results in the network being absorbed in a consensus state in time (with high probability) and the consensus is obtained on the opinion held by the majority of nodes initially. In this paper, we study the robustness of this algorithm to node failures. In particular, we assume that with a constant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDistributed systems and fault tolerance · Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
