Computational Evidence Against Quadratic-Cubic Factorization for the Second Cuboid Quintic
Valery Asiryan, Randall L. Rathbun

TL;DR
This paper provides computational evidence that the specific family of quintic polynomials related to the second cuboid problem do not factor into quadratic and cubic polynomials over the rationals, suggesting such factorizations are unlikely.
Contribution
The authors analyze a parametric family of quintic polynomials derived from the second cuboid problem and provide computational evidence against their quadratic-cubic factorizations.
Findings
No rational points with s>0 and s≠1 found up to height 10^9
The polynomial P_s(x) likely admits no quadratic factor over Q for s>0, s≠1
Conditional on the completeness of the rational point search, quadratic-cubic factorizations are excluded
Abstract
Let be Sharipov's even monic degree- second cuboid polynomial depending on coprime integers . Writing as a quintic in produces an associated monic quintic polynomial. After the weighted normalization and we obtain a one-parameter family such that \[ Q_{p,q}(t)=q^{20}\,P_s\!\left(\frac{t^{2}}{q^{4}}\right)\qquad\text{with}\qquad s=\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)^{2}. \] Assuming a quadratic divisor with , we reduce divisibility of to the vanishing of an explicit remainder \[ R(x)=R_{1}(s,a,b)\,x+R_{0}(s,a,b). \] A key structural observation is that and are quadratic in and that, on the equation , the second condition becomes linear in . This yields a one-direction elimination to a plane obstruction curve with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPolynomial and algebraic computation · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
