Standardized Images and Evaluation Metrics for Tomography
Anna Frixou, Theodoros Leontiou, Efstathios Stiliaris, Costas N. Papanicolas

TL;DR
This paper introduces a standardized, physically grounded framework with reference images and advanced metrics for evaluating high-fidelity tomographic reconstructions, surpassing traditional global metrics.
Contribution
It presents a novel evaluation framework with reference images and diagnostic tools that detect subtle differences in tomographic reconstructions beyond conventional metrics.
Findings
Framework exposes discrepancies undetected by traditional metrics.
Application to SPECT demonstrates improved sensitivity in evaluation.
Method generalizes to various tomographic modalities.
Abstract
Advances in instrumentation and computation have enabled increasingly sophisticated tomographic reconstruction methods. However, existing evaluation practices -- often based on simple phantoms and global image metrics -- are limited in their ability to differentiate among modern high-fidelity reconstructions. A standardized, quantitative framework capable of revealing subtle yet meaningful differences is therefore required. We introduce such a framework, built upon two core components. The first is a set of four standardized reference images -- Source, Detector, Ideal, and Realistic -- each derived from physical modeling and representing a distinct stage in the imaging and reconstruction chain. The second is a suite of diagnostic and quantitative tools that remain sensitive in regimes where conventional metrics (e.g., SSIM, PSNR, NMSE, CC) tend to saturate. These include pixel-wise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
