Innovation Capacity of Dynamical Learning Systems
Anthony M. Polloreno

TL;DR
This paper introduces the innovation capacity in dynamical learning systems, explaining the missing capacity in noisy reservoirs and providing a theoretical framework for understanding the tradeoff between predictable and innovation components.
Contribution
It defines the innovation capacity, proves a conservation law with predictable capacity, and offers an explicit tradeoff and geometric interpretation in linear-Gaussian regimes.
Findings
Conservation law: predictable plus innovation capacity equals the rank of the covariance matrix.
Explicit tradeoff between temperature and predictable capacity in Gaussian regimes.
Innovation capacity relates to the complexity of distinguishable histories and sample complexity.
Abstract
In noisy physical reservoirs, the classical information-processing capacity quantifies how well a linear readout can realize tasks measurable from the input history, yet can be far smaller than the observed rank of the readout covariance. We explain this ``missing capacity'' by introducing the innovation capacity , the total capacity allocated to readout components orthogonal to the input filtration (Doob innovations, including input-noise mixing). Using a basis-free Hilbert-space formulation of the predictable/innovation decomposition, we prove the conservation law , so predictable and innovation capacities exactly partition the rank of the observable readout dimension covariance . In linear-Gaussian Johnson-Nyquist regimes,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Quantum many-body systems
