AI Washing and the Erosion of Digital Legitimacy: A Socio-Technical Perspective on Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Business
Nelly Elsayed

TL;DR
This paper explores AI washing in business, highlighting its practices, impacts, and long-term risks, and proposes a typology to understand and mitigate superficial AI claims to protect trust and legitimacy.
Contribution
It introduces a typology of AI washing practices and analyzes their organizational, industry, and societal impacts from a socio-technical perspective.
Findings
AI washing can yield short-term gains for firms.
It can cause reputational damage and erosion of trust.
Long-term consequences include resource misallocation.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, tools, and technologies has opened up novel, unprecedented opportunities for businesses to innovate, differentiate, and compete. However, growing concerns have emerged about the use of AI in businesses, particularly AI washing, in which firms exaggerate, misrepresent, or superficially signal their AI capabilities to gain financial and reputational advantages. This paper aims to establish a conceptual foundation for understanding AI washing. In this paper, we draw on analogies from greenwashing and insights from Information Systems (IS) research on ethics, trust, signaling, and digital innovation. This paper proposes a typology of AI washing practices across four primary domains: marketing and branding, technical capability inflation, strategic signaling, and governance-based washing. In addition, we examine their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
