Deriving Decoder-Free Sparse Autoencoders from First Principles
Alan Oursland

TL;DR
This paper develops a theoretical framework for decoder-free sparse autoencoders using log-sum-exp objectives, demonstrating how implicit EM dynamics influence learning and component interpretability.
Contribution
It introduces a novel single-layer encoder model with LSE and InfoMax regularization, deriving explicit EM-like behavior and insights into component collapse and diversity.
Findings
Gradient-responsibility identity holds exactly.
LSE alone causes collapse without volume control.
Variance and decorrelation prevent dead components and redundancy.
Abstract
Gradient descent on log-sum-exp (LSE) objectives performs implicit expectation--maximization (EM): the gradient with respect to each component output equals its responsibility. The same theory predicts collapse without volume control analogous to the log-determinant in Gaussian mixture models. We instantiate the theory in a single-layer encoder with an LSE objective and InfoMax regularization for volume control. Experiments confirm the theory's predictions. The gradient--responsibility identity holds exactly; LSE alone collapses; variance prevents dead components; decorrelation prevents redundancy. The model exhibits EM-like optimization dynamics in which lower loss does not correspond to better features and adaptive optimizers offer no advantage. The resulting decoder-free model learns interpretable mixture components, confirming that implicit EM theory can prescribe architectures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
