Response to 2512.23460[hep-ph] by Czarnecki and Khanna ("False vacuum decay and flaws in Frampton's model for the origin of life")

TL;DR

This paper provides a detailed response to critiques of their previous work on false vacuum decay and its implications for models of the origin of life, clarifying misunderstandings and defending their methodology.

Contribution

It offers a rebuttal to specific criticisms of their earlier theoretical model connecting false vacuum decay to origin-of-life scenarios.

Findings

Clarifies misconceptions about false vacuum decay

Defends the validity of their original model

Addresses specific points raised in the critique

Abstract

We respond to a critique 2512.23460[hep-ph] of our paper 2505.05634[hep-ph]