LLM Flow Processes for Text-Conditioned Regression
Felix Biggs, Samuel Willis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach combining LLMs with diffusion-based neural processes to improve text-conditioned regression, addressing error cascades and calibration issues in sequence predictions.
Contribution
It proposes a new method that integrates LLM densities with neural processes, enhancing calibration and local consistency in text-conditioned regression tasks.
Findings
Better-calibrated predictions achieved
Locally consistent trajectories produced
Text-conditioned function space selection demonstrated
Abstract
Recent work has demonstrated surprisingly good performance of pre-trained LLMs on regression tasks (for example, time-series prediction), with the ability to incorporate expert prior knowledge and the information contained in textual metadata. However we observe major error cascades even in short sequences < ~100 points; these models are also computationally intensive and difficult to parallelise. Marginal LLM predictions do not suffer this issue and are trivially parallelised, but can predict over-broad densities. To address this, we propose combining these densities with a lightweight (diffusion-based) neural process. We show that this combination leads to better-calibrated predictions overall, outputs locally consistent trajectories, and leads to text-conditioned function space selection in the meta-learner. As part of this work we propose a gradient-free (and non-Monte Carlo) method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
