FACTUM: Mechanistic Detection of Citation Hallucination in Long-Form RAG
Maxime Dassen, Rebecca Kotula, Kenton Murray, Andrew Yates, Dawn Lawrie, Efsun Kayi, James Mayfield, Kevin Duh

TL;DR
FACTUM introduces a mechanistic framework with four scores to detect citation hallucinations in RAG models, revealing how model scale influences citation correctness and outperforming baselines.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel mechanistic analysis framework, FACTUM, that identifies scale-dependent signatures of citation correctness in RAG models.
Findings
Correct citations show higher parametric force and attention sink usage.
Model scale affects the signature of citation correctness, with different strategies at 3B and 8B scales.
FACTUM outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by up to 37.5% in AUC.
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models are critically undermined by citation hallucinations, a deceptive failure where a model cites a source that fails to support its claim. While existing work attributes hallucination to a simple over-reliance on parametric knowledge, we reframe this failure as an evolving, scale-dependent coordination failure between the Attention (reading) and Feed-Forward Network (recalling) pathways. We introduce FACTUM (Framework for Attesting Citation Trustworthiness via Underlying Mechanisms), a framework of four mechanistic scores: Contextual Alignment (CAS), Attention Sink Usage (BAS), Parametric Force (PFS), and Pathway Alignment (PAS). Our analysis reveals that correct citations are consistently marked by higher parametric force (PFS) and greater use of the attention sink (BAS) for information synthesis. Crucially, we find that "one-size-fits-all"…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
