A Stock-Flow Framework for Editorial Board Dynamics: The Case of Economics Journals, 1866-2019
Alberto Baccini

TL;DR
This paper introduces a formal stock-flow framework to analyze the long-term dynamics of editorial boards in economics journals from 1866 to 2019, revealing phases of growth, stability, and structural change.
Contribution
It develops a novel longitudinal model for editorial board dynamics and applies it to a comprehensive historical database, uncovering structural shifts over more than a century.
Findings
Growth phase from 1946 to 1956 marked by expansion and new journal founding.
Recent years show low flux and increased stability in editorial communities.
Framework enables long-term analysis of journal evolution and gatekeeping structures.
Abstract
Research on the editorial boards of scholarly journals has predominantly relied on static, cross-sectional data, focusing on their composition or interlocking editorships at single points in time. To address this gap, a formal stock-flow framework is developed for analyzing the longitudinal dynamics of editorial boards. The model integrates three interconnected layers: journal demographics, the dynamics of editorial positions, and the dynamics of board members. This framework is applied to the Gatekeepers of Economics Longitudinal Database (GOELD), which contains annual snapshots of editorial boards for approximately 1,700 economics journals from 1866 to 2006 (by decade), plus the years 2012 and 2019. The period until 1946 was characterized by small-scale: few journals and compact editorial communities. The decade from 1946 to 1956 marked the shift toward a ''big science'' model,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
