Propositional Abduction via Only-Knowing: A Non-Monotonic Approach
Sanderson Molick (Division of Humanities - Federal Institute of Para), Vaishak Belle (School of Informatics - University of Edinburgh)

TL;DR
This paper presents a non-monotonic logic framework for propositional abduction based on only-knowing, integrating modal operators and preferential relations to model abductive reasoning and explanation selection.
Contribution
It introduces a novel modal logic of knowledge and abduction extending Levesque's only-knowing, with a non-monotonic extension for explanation selection.
Findings
Provides a formal non-monotonic logic for abduction
Establishes properties of the non-monotonic consequence relations
Demonstrates the framework's ability to model explanation selection methods
Abstract
The paper introduces a basic logic of knowledge and abduction by extending Levesque logic of only-knowing with an abduction modal operator defined via the combination of basic epistemic concepts. The upshot is an alternative approach to abduction that employs a modal vocabulary and explores the relation between abductive reasoning and epistemic states of only knowing. Furthermore, by incorporating a preferential relation into modal frames, we provide a non-monotonic extension of our basic framework capable of expressing different selection methods for abductive explanations. Core metatheoretic properties of non-monotonic consequence relations are explored within this setting and shown to provide a well-behaved foundation for abductive reasoning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy and History of Science · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
