The complexity of being monitorable
Riccardo Camerlo, Francesco Dagnino

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the topological complexity of monitorable sets in countable spaces using descriptive set theory, revealing that their complexity varies significantly depending on whether the space is second countable.
Contribution
It characterizes the descriptive set-theoretic complexity of monitorable sets in countable spaces and distinguishes between second countable and non-second countable cases.
Findings
Monitorable sets are $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}^0_3$ in second countable spaces.
In non-second countable spaces, monitorable sets can be $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}^1_1$-complete.
The complexity of monitorable sets depends on the topological properties of the space.
Abstract
We study monitorable sets from a topological standpoint. In particular, we use descriptive set theory to describe the complexity of the family of monitorable sets in a countable space . When is second countable, we observe that the family of monitorable sets is and determine the exact complexities it can have. In contrast, we show that if is not second countable then the family of monitorable sets can be much more complex, giving an example where it is -complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cellular Automata and Applications
