Automated Reproducibility Has a Problem Statement Problem
Thijs Snelleman, Peter Lundestad Lawrence, Holger H. Hoos, Odd Erik Gundersen

TL;DR
This paper proposes a general problem statement for reproducibility in empirical studies, using an automated method to extract key study components, and demonstrates its effectiveness across diverse AI research papers.
Contribution
It introduces a structured, automated approach to represent empirical studies for reproducibility, validated on 20 AI research papers with positive author feedback.
Findings
Majority of author feedback is positive on the representation
Method successfully captures hypotheses, experiments, and interpretations
Some details, like experimental results, need improved extraction
Abstract
Background. Reproducibility is essential to the scientific method, but reproduction is often a laborious task. Recent works have attempted to automate this process and relieve researchers of this workload. However, due to varying definitions of reproducibility, a clear problem statement is missing. Objectives. Create a generalisable problem statement, applicable to any empirical study. We hypothesise that we can represent any empirical study using a structure based on the scientific method and that this representation can be automatically extracted from any publication, and captures the essence of the study. Methods. We apply our definition of reproducibility as a problem statement for the automatisation of reproducibility by automatically extracting the hypotheses, experiments and interpretations of 20 studies and assess the quality based on assessments by the original authors of each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
