Personalized Medication Planning via Direct Domain Modeling and LLM-Generated Heuristics
Yonatan Vernik, Alexander Tuisov, David Izhaki, Hana Weitman, Gal A. Kaminka, Alexander Shleyfman

TL;DR
This paper presents a method for scaling personalized medication planning by combining domain-specific modeling with LLM-generated heuristics, significantly increasing the number of medications considered and improving planning efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach that uses LLMs to generate problem-specific heuristics for search algorithms, enabling larger-scale medication planning.
Findings
Coverage increased to at least 28 medications
Planning time significantly reduced
Demonstrated practical potential for clinical use
Abstract
Personalized medication planning involves selecting medications and determining a dosing schedule to achieve medical goals specific to each individual patient. Previous work successfully demonstrated that automated planners, using general domain-independent heuristics, are able to generate personalized treatments, when the domain and problems are modeled using a general domain description language (\pddlp). Unfortunately, this process was limited in practice to consider no more than seven medications. In clinical terms, this is a non-starter. In this paper, we explore the use of automatically-generated domain- and problem-specific heuristics to be used with general search, as a method of scaling up medication planning to levels allowing closer work with clinicians. Specifically, we specify the domain programmatically (specifying an initial state and a successor generation procedure),…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
