Toward Maturity-Based Certification of Embodied AI: Quantifying Trustworthiness Through Measurement Mechanisms
Michael C. Darling, Alan H. Hesu, Michael A. Mardikes, Brian C. McGuigan, Reed M. Milewicz

TL;DR
This paper introduces a maturity-based framework for certifying embodied AI systems by establishing structured assessment methods, quantitative scoring, and trade-off navigation, exemplified through uncertainty quantification and a UAS detection case study.
Contribution
It presents a novel certification framework for embodied AI that incorporates explicit measurement mechanisms and structured assessment processes.
Findings
Feasibility demonstrated via UAS detection case study
Uncertainty quantification as an effective measurement mechanism
Framework supports navigating multi-objective trustworthiness trade-offs
Abstract
We propose a maturity-based framework for certifying embodied AI systems through explicit measurement mechanisms. We argue that certifiable embodied AI requires structured assessment frameworks, quantitative scoring mechanisms, and methods for navigating multi-objective trade-offs inherent in trustworthiness evaluation. We demonstrate this approach using uncertainty quantification as an exemplar measurement mechanism and illustrate feasibility through an Uncrewed Aircraft System (UAS) detection case study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
