The Anatomy of a Successful Student Scrum Team: Motivation, Personalities, and Academic Adaptation
Nadia Damianova, Santiago Berrezueta-Guzman

TL;DR
This study examines how student-led Scrum teams adapt agile practices over a year in hybrid academic environments, highlighting effective coordination, flexible sprints, and the importance of motivation and roles.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into long-term Scrum implementation in student projects, including adaptations for academic schedules and hybrid work.
Findings
Lightweight, tool-mediated coordination maintained progress during remote periods.
One-week sprints and flexible ceremonies aligned Scrum with academic timelines.
Shared motivation, role clarity, and working styles are as important as process mechanics.
Abstract
Agile methods, and Scrum in particular, are widely taught in software engineering education; however, there is limited empirical evidence on how these practices function in long-running, student-led projects under academic and hybrid work constraints. This paper presents a year-long case study of an eight-person student development team tasked with designing and implementing a virtual reality game that simulates a university campus and provides program-related educational content. We analyze how the team adapted Scrum practices (sprint structure, roles, backlog management) to fit semester rhythms, exams, travel, and part-time availability, and how communication and coordination were maintained in a hybrid on-site/remote environment. Using qualitative observations and artifacts from Discord, Notion, and GitHub, as well as contribution metrics and a custom communication effectiveness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices · Teaching and Learning Programming · Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
