Diamond Open Access: The AMR Experiment
Alex Kontorovich

TL;DR
This paper discusses the development and operation of diamond open access mathematics journals by the Association for Mathematical Research, highlighting infrastructure, costs, and practices that support the model's viability.
Contribution
It provides a detailed case study of the AMR's diamond open access journals, emphasizing a lightweight institutional framework to facilitate adoption.
Findings
Lightweight infrastructure reduces operational barriers.
Cost-effective model supports sustainable open access.
Clear editorial practices ensure quality and viability.
Abstract
Diamond open access journals charge neither readers nor authors. Despite long-standing support for this ideal within mathematics, relatively few such journals exist. This article documents the Association for Mathematical Research's experience building and operating diamond open access journals, focusing on the infrastructure, cost, and editorial practices that make the model viable. It aims to clarify why earlier reform efforts have been difficult to replicate and how a lightweight institutional framework can lower the barrier to adoption.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing · Academic Publishing and Open Access · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
