Localization of joint quantum measurements on $\mathbb{C}^d \otimes \mathbb{C}^d$ by entangled resources with Schmidt number at most $d$
Seiseki Akibue, Jisho Miyazaki

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when joint quantum measurements on bipartite systems can be implemented with limited entanglement, revealing fundamental constraints and providing a complete classification for certain cases.
Contribution
It offers a protocol-independent algebraic characterization of localizable PVMs and resolves a conjecture on two-qubit measurement localization.
Findings
Rank-1 PVMs with a maximally entangled element can be localized with Schmidt number at most d if they form a maximally entangled basis.
Two-qubit rank-1 PVMs can be localized with two-qubit entanglement, resolving a conjecture of Gisin and Del Santo.
The characterization extends to ideal two-qudit measurements, strengthening previous results.
Abstract
Localizable measurements are joint quantum measurements that can be implemented using only non-adaptive local operations and shared entanglement. We provide a protocol-independent characterization of localizable projection-valued measures (PVMs) by exploiting algebraic structures that any such measurement must satisfy. We first show that a rank-1 PVM on containing an element with the maximal Schmidt rank can be localized using entanglement of a Schmidt number at most if and only if it forms a maximally entangled basis corresponding to a nice unitary error basis. This reveals strong limitations imposed by non-adaptive local operations, in contrast to the adaptive setting where any joint measurement is implementable. We then completely characterize two-qubit rank-1 PVMs that can be localized with two-qubit entanglement, resolving a conjecture of Gisin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
