Understanding Human Perception of Music Plagiarism Through a Computational Approach
Daeun Hwang, Hyeonbin Hwang

TL;DR
This paper investigates how humans perceive music plagiarism by analyzing key musical features and proposes a novel LLM-based framework to systematically evaluate musical similarity from a human perception perspective.
Contribution
It identifies the key criteria humans use to perceive music plagiarism and introduces a systematic LLM-based approach for evaluating musical similarity.
Findings
Humans focus on melody, rhythm, and chord progression in plagiarism perception.
The LLM-as-a-judge framework effectively models human perception criteria.
Key features and variation levels influence perceived musical similarity.
Abstract
There is a wide variety of music similarity detection algorithms, while discussions about music plagiarism in the real world are often based on audience perceptions. Therefore, we aim to conduct a study to examine the key criteria of human perception of music plagiarism, focusing on the three commonly used musical features in similarity analysis: melody, rhythm, and chord progression. After identifying the key features and levels of variation humans use in perceiving musical similarity, we propose a LLM-as-a-judge framework that applies a systematic, step-by-step approach, drawing on modules that extract such high-level attributes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMusic and Audio Processing · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Music Technology and Sound Studies
