Socially-Aware Recommender Systems Mitigate Opinion Clusterization
Lukas Sch\"uepp, Carmen Amo Alonso, Florian D\"orfler, Giulia De Pasquale

TL;DR
This paper introduces a socially-aware recommender system that leverages social network topology to reduce opinion polarization and filter bubbles, balancing content diversity with personalization.
Contribution
It develops a novel social network-aware recommender system that explicitly models user-creator interactions and social influence to mitigate opinion clustering.
Findings
The approach effectively reduces opinion polarization.
Exploiting social network topology enhances content diversification.
The method balances personalization with diversity.
Abstract
Recommender systems shape online interactions by matching users with creators content to maximize engagement. Creators, in turn, adapt their content to align with users preferences and enhance their popularity. At the same time, users preferences evolve under the influence of both suggested content from the recommender system and content shared within their social circles. This feedback loop generates a complex interplay between users, creators, and recommender algorithms, which is the key cause of filter bubbles and opinion polarization. We develop a social network-aware recommender system that explicitly accounts for this user-creators feedback interaction and strategically exploits the topology of the user's own social network to promote diversification. Our approach highlights how accounting for and exploiting user's social network in the recommender system design is crucial to…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- The idea of theoretically analyzing the interaction between recommendation and social networks under FJ model (with high-dimensional opinions) is novel. - The paper is theoretically solid, despite some simplified assumptions. - The studied topic is still of great importance nowadays.
1. I think this paper has not phrased its main contributions accurately. It claims to have developed a socially-aware recommendation system, but this idea is not novel. Most mainstream social media platform these days such as Meta and LinkedIn have used social networks in their recommendations with algorithms taking care of topic diversification and polarization. The proposed recommendation system in Section is more of a high-level idea sketch rather than any real system that can operate on real
1. Clear formulation of a closed-loop social–RS dynamic. 2. Provides a simple, interpretable design knob (d-hop neighborhood). 3. Theoretical complementarity between social and RS influence is insightful. 4. Experiments illustrate a meaningful satisfaction–clusterization trade-off.
1. Theoretical results rely on static user partitions, deterministic recommendations (k=1), and diagonal social influence matrices—settings that largely remove true social interactions. Lemma-level assumptions are not empirically validated, and the gap between deterministic theory and stochastic simulations (softmax sampling) remains unaddressed. 2. All experiments use synthetic networks constructed from initial opinion similarity, which risks circular reasoning regarding clusterization. Only 2-
(S1) This paper introduces a new perspective to the study of user-creator feedback interaction in recommender systems: social network. In addition to the recommended content, users' opinions are also affected by their neighbors on the social network. This paper shows that such social network structure can be leveraged to reduce polarization. This is an interesting observation. It is a good positive contribution to the largely negative literature on polarization in recommender systems.
However, I have major concerns about the theoretical rigor of this work. (W1) **Lack of a formal definition of “influence” in Theorem 1**. Theorem 1 claims that "increasing the influence of A reduces the influence of B". Here, A and B are matrices describing social and recommender effects, but the paper never defines what "influence" means in a quantitative sense. Although the notation suggests that A and B affect users’ steady-state opinions, the authors do not provide a scalar metric (e.g.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
