Discrete vs continuum gravitational diagrams in the soft synchronous gauge
V.M. Khatsymovsky

TL;DR
This paper investigates the differences between discrete and continuum gravitational diagrams in a specific gauge, proposing a soft gauge fixing method to handle singularities and comparing propagator behaviors.
Contribution
It introduces a soft synchronous gauge fixing approach for discrete gravity, analyzes the resulting propagator poles, and compares discrete and continuum cases, including ghost contributions.
Findings
Propagator pole doubling in discrete gravity compared to continuum.
A principal value prescription resolves singularities and ensures diagram finiteness.
Ghost contributions vanish in the soft gauge fixing limit.
Abstract
Due to the non-renormalizability of gravity, the perturbative expansion has sense, say, for its discrete simplicial (Regge calculus) version. A finite-difference form of gravity action has diffeomorphism symmetry at leading order over metric variations from site to site, and we add a term bilinear in , , to "softly" fix the synchronous gauge at , thus removing singularities at . For the symmetric derivative , the propagator has a graviton pole at or, at small , at close to 0 or . This pole doubling compared to the continuum does not arise from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
