OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment
Ming Zhang, Kexin Tan, Yueyuan Huang, Yujiong Shen, Chunchun Ma, Li Ju, Xinran Zhang, Yuhui Wang, Wenqing Jing, Jingyi Deng, Huayu Sha, Binze Hu, Jingqi Tong, Changhao Jiang, Yage Geng, Yuankai Ying, Yue Zhang, Zhangyue Yin, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang

TL;DR
OpenNovelty is an LLM-powered system that automates scholarly novelty assessment by retrieving and analyzing relevant prior work to produce verifiable, evidence-based review reports, enhancing fairness and transparency in peer review.
Contribution
The paper introduces OpenNovelty, a novel LLM-based system that performs structured, verifiable novelty analysis by integrating retrieval, hierarchical classification, and synthesis for peer review.
Findings
Successfully deployed on 500+ submissions with publicly available reports.
Effectively identifies relevant prior work, including overlooked related papers.
Provides transparent, evidence-backed novelty assessments.
Abstract
Evaluating novelty is critical yet challenging in peer review, as reviewers must assess submissions against a vast, rapidly evolving literature. This report presents OpenNovelty, an LLM-powered agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis. The system operates through four phases: (1) extracting the core task and contribution claims to generate retrieval queries; (2) retrieving relevant prior work based on extracted queries via semantic search engine; (3) constructing a hierarchical taxonomy of core-task-related work and performing contribution-level full-text comparisons against each contribution; and (4) synthesizing all analyses into a structured novelty report with explicit citations and evidence snippets. Unlike naive LLM-based approaches, \textsc{OpenNovelty} grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments. We deploy our system on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExpert finding and Q&A systems · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
