A Biologically Plausible Dense Associative Memory with Exponential Capacity
Mohadeseh Shafiei Kafraj, Dmitry Krotov, Peter E. Latham

TL;DR
This paper introduces a biologically plausible associative memory model with exponential capacity by using a novel threshold nonlinearity, enabling distributed representations and high storage capacity beyond previous limitations.
Contribution
The authors propose a new associative memory network with threshold nonlinearity that allows distributed representations, significantly increasing capacity to exponential in hidden units, overcoming prior winner-take-all constraints.
Findings
Achieves exponential capacity in hidden units
Supports distributed, compositional memory representations
Maintains class-discriminative structure in low-dimensional hidden space
Abstract
Krotov and Hopfield (2021) proposed a biologically plausible two-layer associative memory network with memory storage capacity exponential in the number of visible neurons. However, the capacity was only linear in the number of hidden neurons. This limitation arose from the choice of nonlinearity between the visible and hidden units, which enforced winner-take-all dynamics in the hidden layer, thereby restricting each hidden unit to encode only a single memory. We overcome this limitation by introducing a novel associative memory network with a threshold nonlinearity that enables distributed representations. In contrast to winner-take-all dynamics, where each hidden neuron is tied to an entire memory, our network allows hidden neurons to encode basic components shared across many memories. Consequently, complex patterns are represented through combinations of hidden neurons. These…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
The paper's main idea is simple and effective. It directly addresses a key limitation of the Krotov and Hopfield (2021) model—linear capacity—by changing the activation function. It also provides a simpler alternative to other recent work that required combining multiple modules to achieve exponential capacity. The theoretical analysis is also nice. The paper provides a clear derivation for how the $N_v \gg N_h$ regime leads to a decoupled hidden layer where all $2^{N_h}$ binary states can be s
In the CIFAR-10 experiment, the assumption used to derive the theories, $N_v \gg N_h$, seems to not to be the case as $N_v=1024, N_h=500$, it would be nice to discuss more about the implications of this. Although not a fault of the paper per se but rather symptomatic of the computational neuroscience literature at large, biological plausibility is a loaded expression and can mean very different things. Also, although the architecture (pairwise synapses, two layers) avoids the implausible intera
1. The network is shown to have exponentially higher capacity than the prior two-layer implementations. 2. The model's fixed points possess large basins of attraction, making the memory retrieval process robust to substantial noise in the visible inputs.
1. While I certainly agree pairwise interactions between neurons is biological, I do not agree with the implication that setwise interactions are not. I think the claim of this point should be more nuanced, e.g., see appendix A.2 of Burns & Fukai (2023). 2. The theoretical exponential capacity relies on the condition that the number of visible units ($N_v$) is much larger than the number of hidden units ($N_h$), i.e., $N_v \gg N_h$ (see L188-193). This does not seem obviously "biological". It wo
- It proposes a simple yet effective fix to a known limit of Krotov and Hopfield 2021; theoretical proof and experiment analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of this proposal - The theoretical analysis is correct, thorough and clearly presented
Conceptually, I feel this paper has the following weaknesses: - The idea, though effective, is incremental to Krotov and Hopfield 2021. This is exacerbated by the fact that Krotov and Hopfield 2021 already discussed different possibilities of hidden/sensory nonlinearities so this paper does not serve as a generalization. - Despite the point about, there is still opportunity for this idea to be influential if the authors could extend it along the lines of biological plausibility (e.g., what if th
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing · Neural Networks and Applications · Neural dynamics and brain function
