TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark comparing manual features, deep learning, and foundation models for ERP analysis across multiple datasets, providing guidance for future method selection.
Contribution
It systematically evaluates various approaches for ERP analysis, establishing a unified pipeline and exploring embedding strategies within Transformer models.
Findings
Deep learning models outperform manual features in ERP classification.
Pre-trained EEG foundation models show promising results on ERP tasks.
Embedding strategies significantly impact Transformer model performance on ERP data.
Abstract
Event-related potential (ERP), a specialized paradigm of electroencephalographic (EEG), reflects neurological responses to external stimuli or events, generally associated with the brain's processing of specific cognitive tasks. ERP plays a critical role in cognitive analysis, the detection of neurological diseases, and the assessment of psychological states. Recent years have seen substantial advances in deep learning-based methods for spontaneous EEG and other non-time-locked task-related EEG signals. However, their effectiveness on ERP data remains underexplored, and many existing ERP studies still rely heavily on manually extracted features. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive benchmark study that systematically compares traditional manual features (followed by a linear classifier), deep learning models, and pre-trained EEG foundation models for ERP analysis. We establish a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
