Thin Tree Verification is coNP-Complete
Alice Moayyedi

TL;DR
This paper proves that verifying whether a given spanning tree is $oldsymbol{ extit{ ext{α}}}$-thin in a graph is coNP-hard, highlighting the computational difficulty of the problem and impacting approaches to related conjectures and algorithms.
Contribution
It establishes the coNP-hardness of verifying the thinness of a tree, a problem previously unresolved, affecting research on the Thin Tree Conjecture and approximation algorithms for ATSP.
Findings
Verifying α-thinness of a tree is coNP-hard.
Implications for the Thin Tree Conjecture and related algorithms.
Highlights computational complexity of a key verification problem.
Abstract
An -thin tree of a graph is a spanning tree such that every cut of has at most an proportion of its edges in . The Thin Tree Conjecture proposes that there exists a function such that for any , every -edge-connected graph has an -thin tree. Aside from its independent interest, an algorithm which could efficiently construct an -thin tree for a given -edge-connected graph would directly lead to an -approximation algorithm for the asymmetric travelling salesman problem (ATSP)(arXiv:0909.2849). However, it was not even known whether it is possible to efficiently verify that a given tree is -thin. We prove that determining the thinness of a tree is coNP-hard.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
