Fair Committee Selection under Ordinal Preferences and Limited Cardinal Information
Ameet Gadekar, Aristides Gionis, Suhas Thejaswi, Sijing Tu

TL;DR
This paper introduces algorithms for fair committee selection using only ordinal preferences and limited cardinal information, achieving low distortion in approximating optimal solutions under fairness constraints.
Contribution
The paper presents the first constant-distortion algorithms for fair $k$-committee selection with limited cardinal information, improving previous bounds and reducing query complexity.
Findings
A factor-5 distortion algorithm with $O(k \, \log^2 k)$ queries.
An improved factor-3 distortion algorithm with $O(k^2)$ queries.
Demonstrates the necessity of limited cardinal information for constant distortion.
Abstract
We study the problem of fair -committee selection under an egalitarian objective. Given agents partitioned into groups (\eg, demographic quotas), the goal is to aggregate their preferences to form a committee of size that guarantees minimum representation from each group while minimizing the maximum \emph{cost} incurred by any agent. We model this setting as the ordinal fair -center problem, where agents are embedded in an unknown metric space, and each agent reports a complete preference ranking (i.e., ordinal information) over all agents, consistent with the underlying distance metric (i.e., cardinal information). The cost incurred by an agent with respect to a committee is defined as its distance to the closest committee member. The quality of an algorithm is evaluated using the notion of distortion, which measures the worst-case ratio between the cost of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Facility Location and Emergency Management
