Power Analysis is Essential: High-Powered Tests Suggest Minimal to No Effect of Rounded Shapes on Click-Through Rates
Ron Kohavi, Jakub Linowski, Lukas Vermeer, Fabrice Boisseranc, Joachim Furuseth, Andrew Gelman, Guido Imbens, Ravikiran Rajagopal

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that high-powered A/B tests reveal minimal or no effect of rounded shapes on click-through rates, contrasting with earlier underpowered studies claiming large effects.
Contribution
The study highlights the importance of high-powered experiments for accurate effect size estimation and reproducibility, challenging previous claims of large UI effects.
Findings
High-powered tests show effect sizes much smaller than initial reports.
95% confidence intervals in high-powered tests include zero.
Independent replications also find negligible effects.
Abstract
Underpowered studies (below 50% power) suffer from the winner's curse: A statistically significant positive estimate must exaggerate the true treatment effect to meet the significance threshold. A study by Dipayan Biswas, Annika Abell, and Roger Chacko published in the Journal of Consumer Research (2023) reported that in an A/B test, simply rounding the corners of square buttons increased the online click-through rate by 55% (p-value 0.037)a striking finding with potentially wide-ranging implications for a digital industry that is seeking to enhance consumer engagement. Drawing on our experience with tens of thousands of A/B tests, many involving similar user interface modifications, we found this dramatic claim implausibly large. To evaluate the claim and provide a more accurate estimate of the treatment effect, we conducted three high-powered A/B tests, each involving…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
