Think Before You Move: Latent Motion Reasoning for Text-to-Motion Generation

TL;DR

This paper introduces Latent Motion Reasoning, a two-stage approach inspired by cognitive science, to improve text-to-motion generation by disentangling semantic planning from physical execution, leading to better alignment and plausibility.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel Latent Motion Reasoning framework with a Dual-Granularity Tokenizer, enabling effective planning and execution in text-to-motion tasks, addressing the semantic-kinematic mismatch.

Findings

Improved semantic alignment in generated motions.

Enhanced physical plausibility of motions.

Versatility demonstrated on multiple baseline models.

Abstract

Current state-of-the-art paradigms predominantly treat Text-to-Motion (T2M) generation as a direct translation problem, mapping symbolic language directly to continuous poses. While effective for simple actions, this System 1 approach faces a fundamental theoretical bottleneck we identify as the Semantic-Kinematic Impedance Mismatch: the inherent difficulty of grounding semantically dense, discrete linguistic intent into kinematically dense, high-frequency motion data in a single shot. In this paper, we argue that the solution lies in an architectural shift towards Latent System 2 Reasoning. Drawing inspiration from Hierarchical Motor Control in cognitive science, we propose Latent Motion Reasoning (LMR) that reformulates generation as a two-stage Think-then-Act decision process. Central to LMR is a novel Dual-Granularity Tokenizer that disentangles motion into two distinct manifolds: a compressed, semantically rich Reasoning Latent for planning global topology, and a high-frequency Execution Latent for preserving physical fidelity. By forcing the model to autoregressively reason (plan the coarse trajectory) before it moves (instantiates the frames), we effectively bridge the ineffability gap between language and physics. We demonstrate LMR's versatility by implementing it for two representative baselines: T2M-GPT (discrete) and MotionStreamer (continuous). Extensive experiments show that LMR yields non-trivial improvements in both semantic alignment and physical plausibility, validating that the optimal substrate for motion planning is not natural language, but a learned, motion-aligned concept space. Codes and demos can be found in \hyperlink{https://chenhaoqcdyq.github.io/LMR/}{https://chenhaoqcdyq.github.io/LMR/}