Distributed Accountability in Democracy: Using MANETs and DTNs in the Face of Acts of Questionable Legality
Mathew Schmidheiser, Milena Radenkovic

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the performance of Epidemic and Wave DTN routing protocols in realistic scenarios involving communication about acts of questionable legality, highlighting their advantages and suggesting future research directions.
Contribution
It compares Epidemic and Wave routing protocols in sensitive communication scenarios, providing insights into their suitability and proposing future research avenues.
Findings
Epidemic routing may be more advantageous in certain scenarios.
Wave routing has specific benefits in other contexts.
The paper discusses future research directions.
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the behavior of the Epidemic and Wave DTN routing protocols in a realistic setting where individuals may wish to communicate with others for support regarding an act of questionable legality. We identify situations where using the Epidemic routing protocol may be more advantageous in such a scenario, and situations where using the Wave routing protocol may be more advantageous instead. We discuss other aspects of our findings in detail and suggest multiple approaches to future works.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks · Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · Distributed systems and fault tolerance
