Data-Free Asymptotics-Informed Operator Networks for Singularly Perturbed PDEs
Jinsil Lee, Youngjoon Hong, Seungchan Ko, Jae Yong Lee

TL;DR
This paper introduces eFEONet, a novel operator network that leverages asymptotic theory and enrichment basis functions to accurately solve singularly perturbed PDEs with minimal data, addressing challenges of sharp layers and high computational cost.
Contribution
The paper presents a data-efficient, asymptotics-informed operator network tailored for singularly perturbed PDEs, incorporating classical theory for improved accuracy and convergence.
Findings
eFEONet accurately captures sharp boundary and interior layers.
The method achieves convergence without extensive training data.
Experimental results validate the approach on representative problems.
Abstract
Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have opened new possibilities for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet robust performance in challenging regimes remains limited. In particular, singularly perturbed differential equations exhibit sharp boundary or interior layers with rapid transitions, where standard ML surrogates often fail without extensive resolution. Generating training data for such problems is also costly, as accurate reference solutions typically require massive adaptive mesh refinement. In this work, we propose eFEONet, an enriched Finite Element Operator Network tailored to singularly perturbed problems. Guided by classical singular perturbation theory, eFEONet augments the operator-learning framework with specialized enrichment basis functions that encode the asymptotic structure of layer solutions. This design enables accurate approximation of sharp…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
Although several methods have been proposed, how to solve singularly perturbed PDEs by using neural network methods is still an interesting research topic.
(i) The proposed method requires to know the exact asymptotic behavior of the solution. However, obtaining the exact asymptotic behavior of the solution is the most challenging part for solving a singularly perturbed PDE. If it is known, the remaining part is relatively simple, either numerical methods or neural networks work well. (ii) It seems that the authors do not know the difference between operator learning and learning the solution of a single PDE initial/boundary value problem. (iii) A
- Singularly perturbed PDEs are important in many scientific and engineering domains. This method shows good accuracy compared to both neural-network based and standard FEM methods. - A convergence analysis is provided for theoretical guarantees.
- If this work is based on FEONet, then the contribution above FEONet should be better clarified, and FEONet should also be compared in the experiments as a baseline. - Most experimental settings are relatively simple, i.e., in low dimension, small range, with ground truths of simple shapes. - The neural network structure is trivial from the perspective of a deep learning society.
1. The paper is clearly written and easy to follow. 2. The idea of enriching basis functions with correctors seems to improve PINNs with prior basis for singularly perturbed differential equations. 3. The theoretical analysis seems sound.
1. The method relies on a previously specified corrector function or corrector function class (as discussed in Appendix E.5). These corrector functions seem to make the key difference with FEMNet and are the key enabler for capturing the fine details in the PDEs considered. However, how to identify such corrector function class is not discussed in the paper, and I believe it is a rather challenging task and the same corrector function might not generalize well across different PDE instances, whi
1.I appreciate the idea of integration of existing analytical methods into an operator learning framework to solve harder problems, instead of increasing data and computing power. 2.The method overcomes the data requirement limitation by being highly data-efficient, requiring minimal training data, or even operating without any training dataset. 3.The numerical results show that eFEONet achieves error reductions of two orders of magnitude compared to existing FNO and ComFNO for problems with
1.The convergence Theorem 3.3 is qualitative and weak, does not align with the high accuracy in numerical experiments. 2.The eFEONet is not well structured in section 3.2. A detailed algorithm should be given instead of a schematic picture. 3.The experiments seems weak since the four singular perturbed problems can be asymptotically analyzed. The corrector functions are easier for these four problem, the extension to other complex singular perturbed problems should be addressed, i.e. the boun
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Differential Equations and Numerical Methods · Numerical methods for differential equations
